Lacosamide and pregnancy: Data from spontaneous and solicited reports.

OBJECTIVE: In pregnancy, it is important to balance the risks of uncontrolled epileptic seizures to the mother and fetus against the potential teratogenic effects of antiseizure medications. Data are limited on pregnancy outcomes among patients taking lacosamide (LCM), particularly when taken as monotherapy. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the pregnancy outcomes of LCM-exposed pregnancies. METHODS: This analysis included all reports in the UCB Pharma pharmacovigilance database of exposure to LCM during pregnancy from spontaneous sources (routine clinical settings) or solicited reports from interventional clinical studies and noninterventional postmarketing studies. Prospective and retrospective reports were analyzed separately. RESULTS: At the data cutoff (August 31, 2021), there were 202 prospective pregnancy cases with maternal exposure to LCM and known outcomes. Among these cases, 44 (21.8%) patients received LCM monotherapy and 158 (78.2%) received LCM polytherapy. Most patients received LCM during the first trimester (LCM monotherapy: 39 [88.6%]; LCM polytherapy: 143 [90.5%]). From the prospective pregnancy cases with maternal LCM exposure, there were 204 reported outcomes (two twin pregnancies occurred in the polytherapy group). The proportion of live births was 84.1% (37/44) in patients who received LCM as monotherapy, and 76.3% (122/160) for LCM polytherapy. The overall proportion of abortions (for any reason) was 15.9% (7/44) with LCM monotherapy, and 22.5% (36/160) with LCM polytherapy. Congenital malformations were reported in 2.3% (1/44) of known pregnancy outcomes with maternal exposure to LCM monotherapy, and 6.9% (11/160) with polytherapy. SIGNIFICANCE: Our preliminary data do not raise major concerns on the use of LCM during pregnancy. Most pregnancies with LCM exposure resulted in healthy live births, and no new safety issues were identified. These findings should be interpreted with caution, as additional data are needed to fully evaluate the safety profile of LCM in pregnancy.

Efficacy and tolerability of lacosamide and controlled-release carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed temporal lobe epilepsy: Post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind trial.

PURPOSE: Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is often associated with drug-resistant seizures. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of lacosamide (LCM) versus controlled-release carbamazepine (CBZ-CR) monotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed TLE. METHODS: Exploratory post hoc analysis of patients with temporal focus of localization (indicated as the only localization focus) in a double-blind, noninferiority, phase 3 trial (SP0993; NCT01243177) in patients aged ≥ 16 years with newly diagnosed epilepsy randomized 1:1 to LCM or CBZ-CR monotherapy. RESULTS: Of 886 treated patients in this trial, temporal lobe focus of localization (TLE) was reported as the single focus for 287 (32.4%) patients (LCM 134, CBZ-CR 153). A similar proportion of patients with TLE on LCM (82  [61.2%]) and CBZ-CR (99  [64.7%]) completed the trial. Kaplan-Meier estimates for 6- and 12-month seizure freedom at the last evaluated dose level (stratified by number of seizures in the 3 months before screening  [≤2 or >2 seizures]) were similar with LCM and CBZ-CR (6 months overall: 88.7% and 89.7%; 12 months overall: 78.3% and 81.7%). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by fewer patients on LCM (73.9%) than CBZ-CR (81.0%). Drug-related TEAEs (assessed by the investigator) were reported in 41.8% of patients on LCM and 52.3% of patients on CBZ-CR; 11.2% of patients on LCM and 15.0% on CBZ-CR discontinued due to TEAEs. CONCLUSION: Lacosamide was efficacious and generally well tolerated as monotherapy in patients with TLE with efficacy outcomes comparable with CBZ-CR, and fewer patients on LCM reported any TEAEs, drug-related TEAEs, or discontinued due to TEAEs.

Effects of lacosamide and carbamazepine on lipids in a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: The effects of anticonvulsants on lipids are the subject of considerable concern and investigation, but there are almost no data on this issue from randomized trials. We evaluated serum lipid profiles in adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy, following randomization to lacosamide (LCM) or carbamazepine (CBZ) monotherapy. METHODS: We analyzed data from a Phase 3, international, randomized, double-blind trial of LCM vs CBZ for the initial treatment of focal epilepsy. Serum lipid profiles in patients not taking lipid-lowering agents and providing blood samples under fasting conditions before treatment, and following 3 or 12 months of treatment with LCM or CBZ at various doses were analyzed. RESULTS: At 12 months, 271 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria for the analysis. No change was observed in LCM-treated patients for total cholesterol, cholesterol fractions, or triglycerides. CBZ-treated patients showed an increase of 21.1 mg/dL in total cholesterol, 12.6 mg/dL in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, 12.5 mg/dL in non-high density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol, and 8.5 mg/dL in HDL cholesterol; triglycerides remained unchanged. The proportion of patients with elevated total cholesterol levels (above the upper limit of the reference range) did not change in the LCM treatment group (37.0% at Baseline; 34.8% at 12 months), but increased from 30.8% (at Baseline) to 49.6% (at 12 months) in the CBZ treatment group. SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides Class II evidence that CBZ elevates serum lipids, whereas LCM has no effect on lipids. It supports LCM as an appropriate choice for new-onset focal epilepsy.

Tolerability and efficacy of lacosamide and controlled-release carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy and concomitant psychiatric conditions: Post hoc analysis of a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.

Psychiatric comorbidities are common in patients with epilepsy. A double-blind noninferiority monotherapy trial (SP0993; NCT01243177) enrolled newly diagnosed patients (≥16 years) with focal or generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Patients were randomized 1:1 to lacosamide or carbamazepine controlled-release (carbamazepine-CR). Here, we report data from an exploratory post hoc analysis of patients who reported ongoing psychiatric conditions (Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities System Organ Class). Of 886 treated patients in the trial, 126 (14.2%; 64 on lacosamide; 62 on carbamazepine-CR) reported at least one ongoing psychiatric condition at screening, most commonly depression (38.1%), insomnia (27.8%), and anxiety (26.2%). In this subgroup, 32/64 (50.0%) patients on lacosamide and 22/62 (35.5%) on carbamazepine-CR completed the trial. The most common reasons for discontinuation in patients on lacosamide and carbamazepine-CR were adverse events (10.9%, 24.2%) and lack of efficacy (18.8%, 11.3%). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 52 (81.3%) of patients on lacosamide and 56 (90.3%) of patients on carbamazepine-CR, most commonly (≥10% patients in either treatment group; lacosamide, carbamazepine-CR) dizziness (12.5%, 16.1%), headache (12.5%, 14.5%), nasopharyngitis (12.5%, 9.7%), fatigue (7.8%, 14.5%), nausea (7.8%, 11.3%), somnolence (1.6%, 12.9%), and gamma-glutamyltransferase increase (1.6%, 12.9%). Overall, 15 (23.4%) lacosamide-treated and 10 (16.1%) carbamazepine-CR treated patients reported psychiatric TEAEs, most commonly (≥3 patients in either treatment group; lacosamide, carbamazepine-CR) depression (4.7%, 0) and anxiety (3.1%, 6.5%). There were no reports of psychotic disorder, epileptic psychosis, acute psychosis, or serious psychiatric TEAEs. Stratified Kaplan-Meier estimates for 6- and 12-month seizure freedom at the last evaluated dose were similar with lacosamide and carbamazepine-CR (6 months 81.0%, 75.6%; 12 months 62.5%, 66.6%). A higher proportion of patients on lacosamide than carbamazepine-CR completed 6 (67.2%, 45.2%) and 12 months (50.0%, 37.1%) of treatment at the last evaluated dose without a seizure. This exploratory post hoc analysis indicated that lacosamide monotherapy was efficacious and generally well tolerated in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy and concomitant psychiatric conditions. In this subpopulation, lacosamide showed similar efficacy and numerically better effectiveness than carbamazepine-CR.